Opinion
August 5, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Willen, J.).
Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The intervenor has failed to demonstrate that Special Term misapprehended or overlooked any pertinent matters of law or fact (CPLR 2221; Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558, 567). In this connection, we note that the intervenor's answer, which detailed his opposition to the site plan, was before the court and was taken into consideration by it in reaching its determination. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.