From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sorge v. Aldebaran Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1916
112 N.E. 1077 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued April 12, 1916

Decided May 2, 1916

John N. Carlisle and Alfred W. Andrews for appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Sorge v. Aldebaran Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1916
112 N.E. 1077 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of Sorge v. Aldebaran Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANGELINA SORGE, Respondent, v . ALDEBARAN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1077 (N.Y. 1916)
112 N.E. 1077

Citing Cases

Matter of Fogarty v. Nat. Biscuit Co.

The principle has been extended to cover injuries to night watchmen. ( Matter of White v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R.…

Matter of Belcher v. Carthage Machine Co.

This court has held that great liberality should be allowed in establishing claims under this statute, but in…