From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sonners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 10, 1987
133 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

September 10, 1987

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant was an officer and owner of the Express Forwarding and Storage Company (hereinafter the Company) for over 30 years when, in March 1985, he decided to sell his interest in the Company. He sold his interest to the other corporate officers for $100,000. For three months following the sale claimant remained employed by the Company at a salary of $40,000 per year. His position was then terminated and he sought unemployment insurance benefits. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

A claimant whose loss of employment is occasioned by his or her sale of stock must demonstrate a compelling reason for the sale in order to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits (Matter of Amato [Catherwood], 26 A.D.2d 599; see, Matter of Gable [Roberts], 133 A.D.2d 484 [decided herewith]). Although claimant believed the Company was declining, there is no evidence that it was facing severe economic hardship. Further, claimant made a substantial profit in the sale of his interest.

Claimant contends that the sale of his stock was not the cause of his employment being terminated. In support of this contention he points to the fact that he remained employed by the Company for three months following the sale. However, the record reflects that the purchasers intended to eliminate the substantial salaries paid to claimant and another individual who sold his interest in the Company. Indeed, claimant's own testimony reflects his knowledge, at the time of the sale, that his job would probably be eliminated. Hence, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Decision affirmed, without costs. Kane, J.P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sonners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 10, 1987
133 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Sonners

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MELVIN SONNERS, Appellant. LILLIAN ROBERTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 10, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Matter of Williams

Furthermore, claimant drew a salary until terminating his employment and the corporation continued to employ…

Matter of Murphy

Claimants were never threatened with discharge or a reduction in salary. Under these circumstances, the…