From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sokolsky v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1976
54 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Summary

In Averill v. Williams (1 Den. 501, 503) it is said an action will not lie against the plaintiff in the execution unless he interfered with the levy, or assented to what had been done by the officer.

Summary of this case from Hill v. White

Opinion

September 20, 1976


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals which, after a hearing, granted the intervenor-respondent's application for an area variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 25, 1975, which (1) dismissed the petition and (2) confirmed the determination. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to intervenor-respondent Larkin. The record indicates that the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Lewisboro, granting an area variance to the intervenor-respondent, was supported by the evidence adduced at the hearing (see Matter of Fulling v Palumbo, 21 N.Y.2d 30). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sokolsky v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 1976
54 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

In Averill v. Williams (1 Den. 501, 503) it is said an action will not lie against the plaintiff in the execution unless he interfered with the levy, or assented to what had been done by the officer.

Summary of this case from Hill v. White
Case details for

Matter of Sokolsky v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STANLEY SOKOLSKY et al., Appellants, v. AVERILL WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Young v. Stone

It has been repeatedly held that a plaintiff in an execution is not liable in trespass for a wrongful levy by…

Wiegmann v. Morimura

Their attorney as such had no authority to bind them by directing a trespass or by ratifying one when…