From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith v. Town of Penfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Finnerty, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, O'Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: For reasons stated in the decision at Special Term (Finnerty, J.), we agree that, once the nonconforming two-story commercial structure which housed a tavern and apartments was destroyed by fire, the Zoning Ordinance required that the restoration of the structure be actually commenced within one year after the destruction. The filing of an application for a building permit is not tantamount to the commencement of construction and the issuance of the permit was a prerequisite to the commencement of construction. The denial here of a building permit after the expiration of one year from the destruction of the structure was neither arbitrary nor capricious. This determination is without prejudice to petitioner's application, if she be so advised, for a variance pursuant to Town of Penfield Zoning Ordinance article XI


Summaries of

Matter of Smith v. Town of Penfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Smith v. Town of Penfield

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARLEEN SMITH, Appellant, v. TOWN OF PENFIELD et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Warner v. Town of Kent Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Nonetheless, even assuming the truth of the petitioner's averments, we conclude that the ZBA was not estopped…