From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith v. Refrigerated Food Express

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1966
27 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

December 23, 1966


Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board that the claimant was employed by the appellant. The board found that there existed a relationship of employer-employee and the appellants contend that the claimant was an independent contractor. The claimant was the operator of a tractor-trailer and hauling articles of the employer when he was involved in an accident. There is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the finding of the board which this court on numerous occasions has referred to as a factual one. (See Matter of Denman v. Many Zanetti, 8 A.D.2d 576, affd. 8 N.Y.2d 799; Matter of Williams v. Solomon, 13 A.D.2d 159.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Gibson, P.J., Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur with Herlihy, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Smith v. Refrigerated Food Express

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1966
27 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Smith v. Refrigerated Food Express

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CHESTER SMITH, Respondent, v. REFRIGERATED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1966

Citations

27 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Matter of Palmer v. Am. Freightways Co., Inc.

y and unemployment insurance; that the lessors received from the lessee various lump sums computed on a per…

Matter of Gregg v. Dallas Mavis Forwarding

Matter of Williams v. Solomon ( supra) does not stand for the proposition that a lessee cannot be the…