From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith v. Chetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 28, 1994

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.


Mandamus does not lie to compel a discretionary act (see, Matter of Molea v. Marasco, 64 N.Y.2d 718). Lawrence, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Smith v. Chetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Smith v. Chetta

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEO SMITH, Petitioner, v. PHILIP J. CHETTA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 873

Citing Cases

Gaul v. Sober

As the determination set forth no other ground for denying the permit, it was not based on "good cause" and…