From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smiros v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 22, 1998


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the amount awarded to the plaintiff from the principal sum of $68,000 to the principal sum of $55,375; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, the order dated June 23, 1997, is amended accordingly, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

The report of a Referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record, and the Referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility ( see, Stone v. Stone, 229 A.D.2d 388; Frater v. Lavine, 229 A.D.2d 564; Kaplan v. Einy, 209 A.D.2d 248; Tai Wing Hong Importers v. King Realty Corp., 208 A.D.2d 710, 711; United States Trust Co. v. Olsen, 194 A.D.2d 481). Here, however, the Referee acknowledged that the only proof with respect to the petitioner's claim that the appellants diverted $66,625 from Repro-Blue, Inc., to BB Blue Print Company, Inc., was two checks, in the amounts of $3,000 and $500 respectively, made payable from Repro-Blue, Inc., to the appellant Richard Lopez. The Referee further determined that the testimony as to any other diversion of income was "inconclusive". Accordingly, the Referee improperly awarded the petitioner $13,325, or 20% of $66,625. The award therefore must be reduced to $700 or 20% of $3,500, and the principal sum of the judgment must be modified accordingly.

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Smiros v. Lopez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 22, 1998
251 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Smiros v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ALEXANDER SMIROS, Respondent, v. RICHARD LOPEZ et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 95

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Thomas

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent. "The report of a Referee should be confirmed…

Rackis v. Adelman

The plaintiff appeals. Although "[t]he report of a Referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are…