From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Slocum v. Robertson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1995
217 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 14, 1995

Appeal from the Allegany County Family Court, Sprague, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly denied respondent's objections to the Hearing Examiner's order. Respondent failed to demonstrate an unforeseen substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of child support (see, Stock v. Stock, 202 A.D.2d 914, 915). Further, respondent's child support obligation was properly determined on a per-household rather than a per-child basis (see, Buck v Buck, 195 A.D.2d 818; Matter of Niagara County Dept. of Social Servs. [Maxwell] v. Cunningham, 188 A.D.2d 1039; Matter of Griffin v. Janik, 185 A.D.2d 635).


Summaries of

Matter of Slocum v. Robertson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1995
217 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Slocum v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DARLENE SLOCUM, Respondent, v. ROY M. ROBERTSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 260

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Niagara County Dep't of Soc. Serv. v. Hueber

In any event, that contention is without merit because the father is the parent of only one child in the…

In re Niagara Cty. Dep. v. Hueber

In any event, that contention is without merit because the father is the parent of only one child in the…