From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Simonsen v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1999
262 A.D.2d 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued April 13, 1999

June 1, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, dated May 5, 1997, which granted the application of Catherine Netterscheim and Peter Netterscheim for a variance, the appeal and the cross appeal are from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), entered April 28, 1998, which granted the petition to the extent of remitting the matter to the Zoning Board of Appeals for reconsideration of the application.

Caputi, Weintraub Neary, Huntington, N.Y. (Gary N. Weintraub of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

James H. Simonsen, Huntington, N.Y., for respondent-appellant.

SONDRA MILLER, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal and cross appeal are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies as of right from a nonfinal order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 ( see, Matter of Okebiyi v. Cortines, 239 A.D.2d 421). None of the parties sought leave to appeal and we decline to grant leave ( see, Anagnos v. Hangac, 239 A.D.2d 533). Accordingly, the appeal and cross appeal are dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Simonsen v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1999
262 A.D.2d 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Simonsen v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOROTHEA J. SIMONSEN, respondent-appellant, v. ZONING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 326 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 649

Citing Cases

Matter of Barden v. Mosca

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a nonfinal order in…