From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Simon v. Hannigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: "A licensing officer has broad discretion in determining whether to grant, deny or revoke a pistol license (Matter of Fromson v Nelson, 178 A.D.2d 479; Matter of Anderson v Mogavero, 116 A.D.2d 885) * * * The licensing officer's determination will not be disturbed unless it is arbitrary and capricious (Matter of King v Ingraham, 113 A.D.2d 977; Matter of Davis v Clyne [ 58 A.D.2d 947])" (Matter of Eddy v Kirk, 195 A.D.2d 1009, 1010-1011, affd 83 N.Y.2d 919). Respondent's determination revoking petitioner's pistol license did not constitute an abuse of discretion and was neither arbitrary nor capricious.


Summaries of

Matter of Simon v. Hannigan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Simon v. Hannigan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EMERY J. SIMON, Petitioner, v. CHARLES J. HANNIGAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 595

Citing Cases

Matter of Dixie v. Mulroy

Petitioner was entitled to appear with counsel and be heard on his request for reinstatement of his pistol…