From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Siegfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1942
265 App. Div. 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

December 30, 1942.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.


Respondent frankly admitted that he had aided and abetted the conduct of the game of policy by accepting and acting under a general retainer from those who controlled the game to appear for any person who might be arrested for operating the game. ( Vide Matter of Davis, 252 App. Div. 591; Matter of Salus, 321 Penn. St. 106.) No other wrongdoing has been charged against the respondent. The court cannot agree with the recommendation of the learned official referee that discipline be limited to censure but decides that the offense requires a suspension from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months.


Summaries of

Matter of Siegfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1942
265 App. Div. 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Siegfried

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JACOB SIEGFRIED, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 964 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Matter of Silver v. Feinberg

In our opinion they are amply sustained by the proof and by the fair inferences therefrom (cf. Matter of…

Matter of Margolin

The proof justifies the inference that respondent, at the behest of those in charge of running a lottery,…