From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shulman v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1998
249 A.D.2d 10 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Lewis Friedman, J.].


Respondent's determination that petitioner lacks the character and fitness to possess firearms is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner impersonated a police officer for purposes of detaining a person in a traffic dispute ( see, Sewell v. City of New York, 182 A.D.2d 469, 472-473. The penalty of revocation does not shock our sense of fairness, the dismissal of related criminal charges against petitioner notwithstanding ( see, Matter of Zalmanov v. Bratton, 240 A.D.2d 173). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Shulman v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1998
249 A.D.2d 10 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Shulman v. Safir

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FREDRIC SHULMAN, Petitioner, v. HOWARD SAFIR, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 10 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Greenwald v. Kelly

Substantial evidence supports respondent's findings that petitioner committed insurance fraud, failed to…