Opinion
April 2, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Lewis Friedman, J.].
Respondent's determination that petitioner lacks the character and fitness to possess firearms is supported by substantial evidence that petitioner impersonated a police officer for purposes of detaining a person in a traffic dispute ( see, Sewell v. City of New York, 182 A.D.2d 469, 472-473. The penalty of revocation does not shock our sense of fairness, the dismissal of related criminal charges against petitioner notwithstanding ( see, Matter of Zalmanov v. Bratton, 240 A.D.2d 173). We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.