From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shkedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 12, 1997
240 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 12, 1997

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant, an operations manager, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits upon a finding by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. The "final straw" leading to claimant's termination was when he left work after the employer's president requested that he stay for a meeting. The employer's president testified that claimant offered no excuse for leaving. Although claimant maintains that he left for religious reasons, this merely presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see, Matter of Perez [Hudacs], 196 A.D.2d 940, 941, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 755). In any event, a claimant's failure to abide by an employer's reasonable request can constitute misconduct (see, Matter of Corso [Hudacs], 201 A.D.2d 817; Matter of Severino [Hartnett], 170 A.D.2d 739) and we conclude in this case that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. Claimant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and White, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Shkedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 12, 1997
240 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Shkedy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PAUL R. SHKEDY, Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 817

Citing Cases

Matter of Attara

According to testimony presented on behalf of the employer, claimant refused to comply with the employer's…