From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shinder

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Dec 9, 1958
15 Misc. 2d 429 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1958)

Opinion

December 9, 1958

Arthur N. Field, petitioner in person.

Krause, Hirsch, Gross Heilpern for Marianne Lowenthal and another, respondents.


Petitioner in this proceeding under section 231-a of the Surrogate's Court Act to have his compensation for legal services fixed moves to strike out respondents' demand for a jury trial. Respondents, who are the executrix and sole legatees under the will, filed an answer in which, among other matters, a counterclaim requesting money damages based upon fraud and deceit was pleaded. They contend that they have a right to a jury trial on the basis of that counterclaim. Their contention is overruled.

There is no constitutional right to a jury trial in a proceeding under section 231-a of the Surrogate's Court Act which is a proceeding of an equitable nature. ( Matter of Richards, 5 A.D.2d 124, 125; Matter of Davis, 10 Misc.2d 347.) A counterclaim in an equity suit did not give rise to a right to a jury trial at common law. ( Matter of Blair, 242 App. Div. 689.) The motion is accordingly granted.

Submit order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Shinder

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Dec 9, 1958
15 Misc. 2d 429 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of Shinder

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of HANNAH SHINDER, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Dec 9, 1958

Citations

15 Misc. 2d 429 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1958)
182 N.Y.S.2d 384

Citing Cases

MATTER OF PEPI

The executrix has demanded a jury trial as a matter of right and the petitioner has objected to same. A…

In re Beiter

There is no requirement for consent by the parties. There is no such right in a determination of attorneys'…