From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shawn P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 12, 1999

Appeal from Order of Wayne County Family Court, Parenti, J. — Abuse.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of Family Court determining, following a hearing, that respondent had sexually abused his girlfriend's two children. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the findings of abuse are supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Philip M., 82 N.Y.2d 238, 243-244; Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 117). The children's out-of-court statements were sufficiently corroborated by the validation testimony of petitioner's expert witness (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]; Matter of Jaclyn P., 86 N.Y.2d 875, 877-878, cert denied sub nom. Papa v. Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs., 516 U.S. 1093; Matter of Nicole V., supra, at 121; Matter of Camron R. [appeal No. 1], 251 A.D.2d 1073; Matter of Jennifer M., 229 A.D.2d 940). The expert testified that the children became anxious, fearful and angry when giving details of the sexual abuse and displayed behavior consistent with children who had been sexually abused. In addition, there was nonhearsay testimony that the children engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior. The fact that the children at times recanted the allegations of abuse does not render their initial statements incredible as a matter of law (see, Matter of Lakeesha R., 229 A.D.2d 965), particularly in view of the evidence that the children recanted based upon the advice of their mother and their fear of respondent.

The court properly admitted in evidence a statewide central register report of child abuse and maltreatment concerning respondent (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [v.]). Contrary to respondent's contention, the court did not rely on that report in finding that the children were abused.

Finally, the court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the attorney for the children's grandmother to attend the hearing (see generally, Family Ct Act § 1043; 22 NYCRR 205.4; Matter of Katherine B., 189 A.D.2d 443, 450).


Summaries of

Matter of Shawn P

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Shawn P

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF SHAWN P. AND SANDRA M. WAYNE, COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 907 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
697 N.Y.S.2d 901

Citing Cases

Oswego Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Lisa H. (In re James L.H.)

Furthermore, "the child gave multiple, consistent descriptions of the abuse and, [a]lthough repetition of an…

Monroe Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Towanda H.–B. (In re Samaj B.)

Based on our determination, we see no need to address the mother's remaining challenges to the sufficiency of…