From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 949 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1984

Decided June 29, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Harold J. Hughes, J.

Bartley J. Costello, III, John J. Ciavardoni and William F. Sheehan for appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Peter H. Schiff and Alan W. Rubenstein of counsel), for respondent.



Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division ( 97 A.D.2d 51).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 949 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Shattenkirk v. Finnerty

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES SHATTENKIRK et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 29, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 949 (N.Y. 1984)
479 N.Y.S.2d 215
468 N.E.2d 53

Citing Cases

Matter of Altruda v. Forsythe

The central thrust of petitioners' challenge is that, because their salaries are tied to the comparatively…

Council for Hous. v. Abrams

The equal protection argument simply fails on its face. General Business Law § 352-e and these emergency…