From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shapiro v. Central Gen. Hosp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1992
181 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Summary

dismissing petition alleging matters within purview of Public Health Law § 2801-b in addition to alleged procedural Violations

Summary of this case from Rose v. Taddonio

Opinion

March 30, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.).


Ordered that on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal and notice of cross appeal are treated as applications for leave to appeal and cross appeal, the applications are referred to Justice Pizzuto, and leave to appeal and cross appeal are granted by Justice Pizzuto (CPLR 5701 [b]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs to the appellants-respondents, and the proceeding is dismissed as premature.

The verified petition is not limited to allegations that Central General Hospital acted in bad faith and failed to comply with its by-laws, but also alleges matters which are within the purview of Public Health Law § 2801-b. The petitioner is "obligated to present his claim of an improper practice, in the first instance, to the administrative body charged with the protection of these statutory rights" (Gaibor v Manhattan Eye, Ear Throat Hosp., 46 N.Y.2d 736, 738; Matter of Libby [Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Center], 163 A.D.2d 388; cf., Matter of Murphy v St. Agnes Hosp., 107 A.D.2d 685, 689). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Bracken and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Shapiro v. Central Gen. Hosp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1992
181 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

dismissing petition alleging matters within purview of Public Health Law § 2801-b in addition to alleged procedural Violations

Summary of this case from Rose v. Taddonio
Case details for

Matter of Shapiro v. Central Gen. Hosp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JACK M. SHAPIRO, Respondent-Appellant, v. CENTRAL GENERAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
581 N.Y.S.2d 430

Citing Cases

Rose v. Taddonio

"This requirement applies to all claims," see Rockland Physician Assocs. v. Grodin, 616 F. Supp. 958, 960…

Meyer v. Forest Hills Hosp.

Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the filing of a complaint with the PHC is not limited to situations where…