From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shanika F

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Rosa, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.

PRESENT: GREEN, A. P. J., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Family Court's determination that the children were permanently neglected by respondent is supported by clear and convincing evidence. The record establishes that, despite petitioner's diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, respondent failed substantially and continuously to plan for the future of the children ( see, Social Services Law § 384-b [a]). Although respondent participated in the services offered by petitioner, she did not successfully address the problems that led to the removal of the children ( see, Matter of Cathleen B., 231 A.D.2d 962, appeal dismissed 90 N.Y.2d 840). "Because she failed to make any progress in overcoming the problems that initially endangered the children and continued to prevent their safe return, the court properly found that respondent was unable to make an adequate plan for her children's future" ( Matter of Rebecca D., 222 A.D.2d 1092).

The court properly determined that a suspended judgment would not be in the best interests of the children ( see, Matter of Sonny H. B., 249 A.D.2d 940).


Summaries of

Matter of Shanika F

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Shanika F

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF SHANIKA F., JOHNNY F., KIMBERLY F., ENRIQUE D. AND ERIC H. ERIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 779

Citing Cases

Matter of James V

Even assuming, arguendo, that respondent's contention is preserved for our review, we conclude that the court…

In re Commitment of Destiny Shantiqua C

Respondent, however, repeatedly refused both of these requests and, in so doing, permanently neglected the…