Opinion
February 26, 1996
Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Sparrow, J.).
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The determinations by the Family Court that Shameka's maternal grandfather had sexually abused her and that the appellant had neglected and derivatively abused Shameka are supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; Matter of Nicole V., 71 N.Y.2d 112, 117). Moreover, notwithstanding the appellant's claims to the contrary, Shameka's out-of-court statements regarding the maternal grandfather's abuse were sufficiently corroborated by, inter alia, Shameka's use of dolls to reenact the sexual abuse (see, Matter of Josephine G., 218 A.D.2d 656; Matter of Racielli C., 215 A.D.2d 477).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.