Opinion
April 9, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Chemung County.
Although petitioner was found guilty of violating several disciplinary rules, he challenges only the finding of guilt with respect to the weapons charge. That charge was based on a misbehavior report by a correction officer who witnessed the incident and also viewed a videotape taken of the incident and a photograph showing petitioner with what the correction officer believed was a rock or lock in a sock in his right hand and a homemade shank in his sweatshirt pocket. This correction officer's testimony at the hearing confirmed the misbehavior report and both the videotape and the photo were made part of the record. The videotape was also viewed by the Hearing Officer. Contrary to petitioner's suggestion, this evidence fully supported the determination. Substantial evidence is such proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support the conclusion or ultimate fact (Matter of Burgos v Coughlin, 108 A.D.2d 194, lv denied 66 N.Y.2d 603). Petitioner's contention that he was not carrying any weapons simply presented a question of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre, 150 A.D.2d 954, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 615).
Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.