From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Secore v. Mantello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 4, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.

Present — Callahan, A.P.J., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition to annul a determination revoking parole and imposing a five-year hold period before he can be reconsidered for parole. We conclude that the petition was properly denied. Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies on the issue of the excessiveness of the five-year hold period. Subsequent to commencement of this proceeding, the Appeals Unit determined that the recommended hold period exceeded two years and remitted the matter to the full Board of Parole for its determination. The record does not reveal whether the full Board has considered the issue or, if it did, the nature of its decision.

Petitioner failed to raise the remaining issues on his administrative appeal. Thus, those issues were not preserved for judicial review (see, Matter of Milburn v New York State Div. of Parole, 173 A.D.2d 1016).


Summaries of

Matter of Secore v. Mantello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Secore v. Mantello

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER G. SECORE, Appellant, v. DOMINIC J. MANTELLO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Stanford

Petitioner contends that the subject parole condition violated his right to free speech. Petitioner never…

Thomas v. Stanford

Petitioner contends that the subject parole condition violated his right to free speech. Petitioner never…