From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1992
179 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 9, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.).


According to the presentment agency, the police approached appellant because they observed his leg protruding from an open rear door of a moving cab. Appellant fled from the cab, but was pursued by the police when the cab driver informed them that he had just been robbed. A subsequent search of appellant at the precinct house uncovered cocaine. There is no merit to appellant's contention that the cocaine should have been suppressed as the fruit of an illegal search. The attendant factors clearly warranted a reasonable suspicion that appellant had committed a crime, justifying a forcible stop (People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223). The subsequent arrest was based upon probable cause, provided when the cab driver caught up with the pursuing officers and identified appellant as one of the three youths who robbed him. The search of his person at the precinct house, where the cocaine was found in his possession, was incident to a lawful arrest.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Sean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 1992
179 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Sean

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SEAN H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 385 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
578 N.Y.S.2d 156

Citing Cases

State v. Phillips

We do not have those building blocks here. ¶ 17. Finally, we mention In the Matter of Sean H., 578 N.Y.S.2d…

People v. Jones

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620,…