From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Scott v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1996
225 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 7, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Count, New York County (William McCooe, J.).


The police officer's memo book sought by petitioner is exempt from FOIL disclosure ( Matter of Scott v Chief Med. Examiner of City of N.Y., 179 A.D.2d 443, 444, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 758, cert denied 506 U.S. 891; see also, Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 223 A.D.2d 468; Matter of Johnson v New York City Police Dept., 220 A.D.2d 320). With respect to the other records sought in both petitioner's original and supplemental petitions, respondent's certification that it has provided petitioner with all of the records in its possession, other than the memo book, relating to petitioner's arrest and conviction was sufficient to establish the nonexistence of the records sought ( see, Matter of Swinton v Record Access Officers, 198 A.D.2d 165; Matter of Rodriguez v Dillon, 210 A.D.2d 416, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 807).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Kupferman, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Scott v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1996
225 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Scott v. N.Y. City Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAROLD SCOTT, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

Sorce v. Noll

The Supreme Court did not err in denying the petition without conducting an in camera examination of the…

Matter of Murray v. Matusiak

Finally, the application to vacate the default judgment was submitted within the statutory time period (CPLR…