From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Scirto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
180 A.D.2d 29 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992.

Vincent Scarsella for petitioner.

George V.C. Muscato for respondent.


Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on February 20, 1973 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Buffalo. On August 13, 1991 the Grievance Committee filed a petition charging him with two counts of conversion of client funds and one other charge. Respondent answered the petition denying the charges. We referred the matter to a Referee for a hearing on the issues of fact raised by the pleadings. Thereafter, the Grievance Committee filed a supplemental petition on March 9, 1992, charging him with additional counts of conversion of client funds. Respondent has failed to file an answer or otherwise move against the charges in the supplemental petition pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.20. Accordingly, the allegations contained in the supplemental petition are deemed admitted (Matter of Supples, 102 A.D.2d 699). Thus, we find that respondent is guilty of violating Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (4) and (7); DR 9-102 (A), (B) (1) and (C) (4) and that he should be disbarred. Additionally, restitution should be ordered of the amounts that the sixth and seventh charges of the supplemental petition allege were converted and not repaid.

BOOMER, J.P., PINE, BALIO, LAWTON and BOEHM, JJ., concur.

Order of disbarment and restitution entered.


Summaries of

Matter of Scirto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
180 A.D.2d 29 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Scirto

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH F. SCIRTO, an Attorney, Respondent. GRIEVANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 29 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
586 N.Y.S.2d 777

Citing Cases

Matter of Scirto

On August 13, 1991, the Grievance Committee filed a petition alleging that, between 1987 and 1989, respondent…