From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sciascia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1976
53 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 10, 1976


Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 5, 1973, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground he voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge. The board could clearly find on the instant record that the delivery truck on which claimant was assigned as a helper on June 21, 1973 made at least two personal and unauthorized deviations as it proceeded on its delivery route and that claimant was aware that such action violated the terms of the union contract. The board was not required to accept the excuses given for these deviations either as credible or justified (Matter of Wade [Levine], 50 A.D.2d 1003), and the fact that claimant was the helper and not the driver is not controlling since the union contract applied also to claimant as well as the driver and the claimant not only never notified anyone of the driver's action but accepted pay for the overtime caused by the breach of the rules. There is thus substantial evidence to support a finding of misconduct (Matter of James [Levine], 34 N.Y.2d 491). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P.J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sciascia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 10, 1976
53 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Sciascia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOSEPH SCIASCIA, Appellant. LOUIS L. LEVINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Johnson

This appeal by the employer followed. The Board's factual finding that the reason for claimant's termination…

In re Epstein

In light of this approval, claimant maintains that her part in this obviously improper scheme did not…