From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schweit v. Abate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1994
200 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 25, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.).


Petitioner tendered his resignation pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, entered into after conferring with counsel and the Administrative Law Judge. The resignation was effective, pursuant to a departmental rule, upon acceptance by the Acting Assistant Commissioner, who was authorized by the statutory appointing authority, and thus could not be withdrawn without respondent's consent (Public Officers Law § 31). The situation is thus distinguishable from that in Matter of Wonderly v. Division of N.Y. State Police ( 80 A.D.2d 974), where it was conceded that petitioner attempted to withdraw his resignation before it had been approved, and that in Matter of Lanthier v. Department of Transp. ( 183 A.D.2d 1083, 1085), where there was a question of fact whether the recipient of the resignation qualified as the statutory "`appointing authority'". Under the circumstances, especially in view of petitioner's history of negotiated settlements of disciplinary charges, the refusal to permit withdrawal of his resignation was not arbitrary or capricious.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Schweit v. Abate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1994
200 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Schweit v. Abate

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DANIEL SCHWEIT, Appellant, v. CATHERINE ABATE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 670

Citing Cases

Pishotti v. New York State Thruway Authority

Lastly, we disagree with petitioner that the refusal to allow him to withdraw his letter of resignation…