From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schweiss v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1984
472 N.E.2d 45 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued September 4, 1984

Decided October 11, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Con. G. Cholakis, J.

Murray Steyer and Frances S. Sirota for Charles Schweiss and others, appellants.

Henry J. Logan, County Attorney ( Denise J. D'Ambrosio of counsel), for Alfred B. Del Bello, as Westchester County Executive, appellant.

Kenneth Pawson and Robert D. Stone for Gordon Ambach, as Commissioner of Education, respondent.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Trudi Mara Schleifer and Francis F. Caputo of counsel), for Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York and another, respondents.

Henry J. Smith and James G. Fine for Phoenix House Programs of New York, Inc., and another, respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division ( 98 A.D.2d 148).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Schweiss v. Ambach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 11, 1984
472 N.E.2d 45 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Schweiss v. Ambach

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES SCHWEISS et al., Appellants, v. GORDON M. AMBACH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 11, 1984

Citations

472 N.E.2d 45 (N.Y. 1984)
472 N.E.2d 45
482 N.Y.S.2d 269

Citing Cases

Planning Bd. No. 4 v. Homes

In view of the lack of significant environmental impact, the defendants' action is defined as a "Type II"…

O'Keeffe v. Bonelli

It has been recognized that not every modification of the use or proposed use of property requires compliance…