From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schilling v. Garguilo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 18, 1980
404 N.E.2d 736 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued March 17, 1980

Decided March 18, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, FRITZ W. ALEXANDER, II, J.

Richard E. Coven for appellant.

Robert D. Clark for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The disposition of this election case turned wholly on factual determinations beyond the power of our court to review; we perceive no questions of law on which the grant of leave to appeal could have been predicated. The effect of any inference to be drawn from the failure of certain individuals to take the witness stand was for resolution by the Special Referee, Special Term and the Appellate Division. Their unanimous refusal to accord conclusive effect to such inference could not be error as a matter of law.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Schilling v. Garguilo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 18, 1980
404 N.E.2d 736 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

Schilling v. Garguilo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALICE J. SCHILLING, Appellant, v. FRANK X. GARGUILO et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 18, 1980

Citations

404 N.E.2d 736 (N.Y. 1980)
404 N.E.2d 736
427 N.Y.S.2d 614

Citing Cases

Keane v. Keane

( Gaglio v Molnar-Gaglio, 300 AD2d 934; Sodaro v Sodaro, 286 AD2d 434; Murphy v Murphy, 6 AD3d 678.) III.…