From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schiavone Construction Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Parness, J.).


The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner's application as premature, since, in compliance with the statute, respondent presented a valid reason why the lien should not be vacated and cancelled, namely, that the amounts subject to the lien were not yet due and payable, and, although the statute permitted the lien to be filed before payment was due, it could not be foreclosed before that date (Matter of Delaware Towers v Siegfried Constr. Co., 41 Misc.2d 227). We would also note that there being no defect upon the face of the lien, its validity can only be tested upon the trial of an action for foreclosure (Dember Constr. Corp. v P R Elec. Corp., 76 A.D.2d 540, 546).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Schiavone Construction Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 24, 1992
181 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Schiavone Construction Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SCHIAVONE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and DAIDONE ELECTRIC OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 24, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 6

Citing Cases

Ger v. Saxony Towers Realty Corp.

Here, while service upon the petitioners of the notices of sale was in accordance with the proprietary lease…

Daimler Tr. v. R&W Auto Body, Inc.

Those service requirements are meant "to insure that [owners] have an adequate opportunity to reclaim their…