From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1966
25 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

April 28, 1966


Order entered February 24, 1966, granting examination of respondents in order to frame a complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants, the motion denied and the application dismissed. In order to obtain an examination to frame a complaint, plaintiff should present facts fairly indicating a cause of action against the adverse party. ( Cotler v. Retail Credit Co., 18 A.D.2d 898.) There is no such showing here.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1966
25 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent, v. HERBERT ALLEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Citing Cases

Tarter v. State of New York

Preaction discovery under CPLR 3102 (c) is not available to determine if a cause of action in fact exists. On…