Opinion
July 8, 1999
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 11, 1998, which, inter alia, reduced claimant's weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero.
Goddard, Ronan Dineen (Gregory E. Ronan of counsel), New York City, for appellant.
Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Norman Uris of counsel), New York City, for respondent.
Before: MIKOLL, J.P., CREW III, PETERS, CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant's benefit rate to zero. Contrary to claimant's argument, the record clearly establishes through his own testimony and the information submitted by the employer that claimant's pension was wholly funded by the employer and that there was an increase in claimant's pension benefits as a result of his final year of employment. Although claimant opted to receive his pension in a lump sum which was then reinvested in an individual retirement account, the pro-rated weekly amount of such payment exceeded the maximum weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate of $300 (see, Labor Law § 590 Lab. [5]; § 600 Lab. [7] [b]). Accordingly, claimant's unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced to zero based on the amount of his pension benefits (see, Matter of Brainin [Sweeney], 239 A.D.2d 639; Matter of Kaplan [Sweeney], 236 A.D.2d 738, 739). Finally, claimant was properly charged with a recoverable overpayment of benefits (see, Matter of Brainin [Sweeney], supra).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.