From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Schatzel v. Connelie

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1984
463 N.E.2d 372 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued February 17, 1984

Decided March 20, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Aaron E. Klein, J.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( John Q. Driscoll and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellants.

Arthur M. Kahn for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

Constitutionality of the provision of subdivision 3 of section 215 of the Executive Law, which authorizes the Superintendent to extend the age limit for State Police candidates, is presumed and that presumption has not been challenged on this appeal. The only question before us, therefore, is whether the Superintendent acted arbitrarily in extending the age limit for candidate Casey but refusing to do so with respect to the present petitioner. On the record before us we cannot say that the different treatment accorded was without rational basis.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Schatzel v. Connelie

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 20, 1984
463 N.E.2d 372 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Schatzel v. Connelie

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN F. SCHATZEL, Respondent, v. WILLIAM G. CONNELIE, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 20, 1984

Citations

463 N.E.2d 372 (N.Y. 1984)
463 N.E.2d 372
474 N.Y.S.2d 971

Citing Cases

Matter of Rotach v. Connelie

When Special Term, which had been made aware of our decision in Matter of Schatzel v. Connelie ( 91 A.D.2d…

Matter of Feimer v. Ward

With respect to the veteran's exception to the subject provision, the privileges and preferences given to…