From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Savitch v. Lange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1985
114 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

October 7, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County.


The sole reason given to petitioner for the disapproval of her application for a pistol license was that the Police Commissioner of New Rochelle recommended that the application be disapproved, and that the County Court had to rely on that recommendation. This reason does not constitute a specific reason for the denial of the application (Penal Law § 400.00 [4-a]). The petitioner must be given the specific reasons for the denial of the pistol license, and be given an opportunity to respond to the objections to her application (see, Matter of Guida v Dier, 54 A.D.2d 86; Matter of Bobrick v Leggett, 71 A.D.2d 869; Matter of Buffa v Police Dept., 47 A.D.2d 841). Therefore, the matter is remitted to the County Court, which shall provide petitioner with the specific reasons gleaned from the police report for the denial of her application for a pistol license and afford her the opportunity to present evidence in response. After receipt of such evidence, the County Court shall make a new determination on petitioner's application. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Savitch v. Lange

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1985
114 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Savitch v. Lange

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BETTY J. SAVITCH, Petitioner, v. KENNETH H. LANGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1985

Citations

114 A.D.2d 372 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Randall

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination denying his pistol…

Sibley v. Watches

We further reject petitioner's contention that the failure to hold a hearing before respondent made his…