From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Savine v. Savine-Rivas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2000
274 A.D.2d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted April 24, 2000.

July 31, 2000.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Caroline Savine-Rivas appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated September 15, 1998, which, after a hearing, found, in effect, that she had committed a family offense within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812 and granted the petitioner an order of protection until September 15, 1999.

Helene Chowes, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the order of protection expired on September 15, 1999, the appeal from the Family Court's determination that the appellant committed a family offense is not academic in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from such an adjudication (see, Matter of Cutrone v. Cutrone, 225 A.D.2d 767).

The Family Court's determination that the appellant committed a family offense within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812 was supported by the weight of the evidence.

The appellant's remaining contentions do not require reversal.


Summaries of

Matter of Savine v. Savine-Rivas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 31, 2000
274 A.D.2d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Savine v. Savine-Rivas

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF FLORENCE R. SAVINE, RESPONDENT, v. CAROLINE SAVINE-RIVAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 585 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 847

Citing Cases

Matter of Mazzola v. Mazzola

The appellant's claim that he did not commit any of the offenses enumerated in Family Court Act § 812 is…

In the Matter of Cleary v. Morgan

Although the order of protection, order of commitment, and order which placed the appellant on probation have…