From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Saunders v. Graboski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 2001
282 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 2001.

April 16, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Planning Board of the Town of Southampton dated July 30, 1998, granting a special exception permit and site plan approval for the construction of a nursing home by Payton Lane Properties, Inc., the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello J.), dated January 7, 2000, which, upon granting the respondents' motion to dismiss the proceeding pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(10), denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Richard M. Mathew, LLC, Bridgehampton, N.Y. (Benjamin E. Carter of counsel), for appellants.

Kimberly A. Judd, Assistant Town Attorney, Southampton, N Y (David Gilmartin of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN and NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Since the petitioners failed to join a necessary party, Payton Lane Properties, Inc., the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding (see, CPLR 1001[a]; see also, Matter of Save Our Open Space v. Planning Bd. of Vil. of S. Nyack, 256 A.D.2d 581; Matter of Baker v. Town of Roxbury, 220 A.D.2d 961; Matter of Llana v. Town of Pittstown, 234 A.D.2d 881, 884).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Saunders v. Graboski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 2001
282 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Saunders v. Graboski

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF HAZEL S. SAUNDERS, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NANCY S…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 403

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Ferruggia

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs. The Supreme Court properly dismissed…

In re Long Island Pine v. Town of Islip

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately…