From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Saporita v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1992
180 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 27, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Stanley Sklar, J.].


Although the proceeding was improperly transferred to this court, we have examined the issues raised, and conclude that petitioner's trial admissions to an ongoing relationship with, and acceptance of a gratuity from, a tow truck operator regulated by respondent and his presence at the tow truck operator's shop for personal reasons while on duty, justified respondent's determination not to reappoint him to the police force.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Saporita v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1992
180 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Saporita v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN SAPORITA, Petitioner, v. LEE BROWN, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 597 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 306

Citing Cases

Roth v. Town of Newburgh

In the case of a non-elected official, he or she “may apply for reinstatement to the appointing authority…

Roth v. Town of Newburgh

In the case of a non-elected official, he or she "may apply for reinstatement to the appointing authority…