From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Santoro v. Finkelstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1950
276 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

January 30, 1950.


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, the temporary city housing rent commission appeals from an order annulling its determination, which denied respondents' application for a certificate for the eviction of a tenant from housing accommodations, and directing it to issue such certificate. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. The building involved is a two-family house in Brooklyn which was purchased by the respondent Thomas Santoro on May 1, 1948, for the undisputed purpose of affording housing accommodations for himself and his parents, the other respondents. At the time of closing of title, the purchaser gave a lease for a period of two years for one of the apartments to the tenant thereof, who is the son of the seller, in pursuance of a provision of the contract of sale to such effect. The certificate was then sought for the other apartment. The finding of appellants that the granting of the lease established an absence of good faith on the part of the purchaser was not capricious, arbitrary or unreasonable. (Cf. Matter of Keller v. Finkelstein, 274 App. Div. 890; Matter of O'Neill v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 720, and Matter of Minio v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 964.) Carswell, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Santoro v. Finkelstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 1950
276 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Santoro v. Finkelstein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS SANTORO et al., Respondents, against MAURICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1950

Citations

276 App. Div. 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Hathaway v. Bornmann

The court did not hold the plaintiff to a higher or different degree of proof than is required in such cases.…