From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Santorelli v. Cowhey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 2, 1998


Upon the petition and the papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court in — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( see, Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear right to the relief sought ( see, Matter of Sanchez v. Orgera, 221 A.D.2d 641; Matter of Arcuri v. Kirk, 231 A.D.2d 962; cf., Matter of Steingut v. Gold, 42 N.Y.2d 311, 315-316).

Miller, J. P., O'Brien, Copertino and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Santorelli v. Cowhey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 2, 1998
247 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Santorelli v. Cowhey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY SANTORELLI, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. COWHEY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Prospect v. Doyle

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and…