From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sanders v. Mfr. Hanover Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1996
229 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 22, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 5240 grants the courts broad discretionary power to control and regulate the enforcement of a money judgment under CPLR article 52 to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage, or other prejudice to any person or the court ( see, Guardian Loan Co. v. Early, 47 N.Y.2d 515). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the relief sought ( see, Matter of AMEV Capital Corp. v. Kirk, 180 A.D.2d 791; cf., Seyfarth v. Bi-County Elec. Corp., 73 Misc.2d 363; Hammond v. Econo-Car of N. Shore, 71 Misc.2d 546; Gilchrist v. Commercial Credit Corp., 66 Misc.2d 791). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sanders v. Mfr. Hanover Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1996
229 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Sanders v. Mfr. Hanover Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HILDY SANDERS, Appellant, v. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 1017

Citing Cases

Rondack Constr. Servs. v. Kaatsbaan Inter. Dance

Teahan Constantino, Poughkeepsie ( Richard I. Cantor of counsel), for nonparty appellant. I. The procedures…

Stern v. Hirsch

We affirm the order entered April 5, 2010, insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from. "CPLR 5240 grants the…