Opinion
November 16, 1943.
Appeal from Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
The issue in this case is whether claimant's husband was appellant's employee during 1939 and 1940. If he was such an employee he constituted the fourth employee so that appellant was subject to the law during that period and consequently claimant worked in a covered employment. Appellant admits that he had three other employees during the period in question. The claimant's husband assisted claimant in her work as superintendent of one of appellant's apartments. He assisted in carrying out ashes, cleaning the incinerator, taking out the garbage, running the boiler, showing apartments, repairing switches and windows, washing boiler tubes, cleaning sewers and other work about the apartment. Each of those was within the knowledge of the employer. Award and decision affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. All concur.