From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Salisbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1966
27 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

December 15, 1966


Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. The board found that at the time claimant was receiving benefits he was a duly elected Town Assessor for which he was compensated. The claimant contends he assumed he was not required to report the form of work since it was not a "real job". The board determined that the work rendered by the claimant to the town constituted employment and, therefore, he was ineligible for benefits paid, which were recoverable, and that he was further subject to a forfeiture of benefits. (See Labor Law, § 594; Matter of Vick [ Catherwood], 12 A.D.2d 120.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Herlihy, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Salisbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1966
27 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Matter of Salisbury

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of J. CARL SALISBURY, Appellant. MARTIN P…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1966

Citations

27 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)