From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sacco v. Profit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1987
133 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Summary

dismissing appeal based on stipulation that appellant agreed not to appeal from the court's determination, noting that parties "are free to chart their own litigation course and may stipulate that the decision of a lower court shall be final, thus waiving their right of appeal"

Summary of this case from Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Capital Royalty Partners II, L.P.

Opinion

September 30, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Doyle, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ. (Order entered Sept. 3, 1987.)


Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: By stipulation on the record, respondent Profit agreed not to appeal from the court's determination. Parties are free to chart their own litigation course and may stipulate that the decision of a lower court shall be final, thus waiving their right of appeal (Matter of New York, Lackawanna W.R.R. Co., 98 N.Y. 447, 453; see also, Mitchell v. New York Hosp., 61 N.Y.2d 208, 214).


Summaries of

Matter of Sacco v. Profit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1987
133 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

dismissing appeal based on stipulation that appellant agreed not to appeal from the court's determination, noting that parties "are free to chart their own litigation course and may stipulate that the decision of a lower court shall be final, thus waiving their right of appeal"

Summary of this case from Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Capital Royalty Partners II, L.P.
Case details for

Matter of Sacco v. Profit

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES A. SACCO, Respondent, v. JOSEPH PROFIT, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Oneida v. David

Present: Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is…

Oneida v. David

Present: Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is…