From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of S. Walter Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1921
195 App. Div. 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

March 11, 1921.

Einar Chrystie, for the petitioner.

Crim Wemple, for the respondent.


The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at the October, 1905, term of the Appellate Division, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.

He was joined as a defendant in the same indictment referred to in Matter of Lindheim ( 195 App. Div. 827), handed down herewith, and was convicted at the same time and for the same offense and received the same punishment.

It follows for the reasons set forth in said opinion that he must be disbarred.

LAUGHLIN, DOWLING, SMITH and GREENBAUM, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of S. Walter Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 11, 1921
195 App. Div. 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

Matter of S. Walter Kaufmann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of S. WALTER KAUFMANN, an Attorney, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1921

Citations

195 App. Div. 830 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kaufmann

The Judiciary Law (§ 88, subd. 3) provides: "Whenever any attorney and counsellor-at-law shall be convicted…

Matter of Kaufmann

Subdivision 3 of section 88 Jud. of the Judiciary Law provides that "Whenever any attorney and…