From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruxton Towers Partnership, Ltd. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 21, 1987
129 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 21, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin F. Klein, J.).


Although Special Term correctly held that section 43 of the Omnibus Housing Act could not be applied to reclassify petitioner's premises prior to the law's effective date (Matter of Berkeley Kay Corp. v New York City Conciliation Appeals Bd., 68 N.Y.2d 851, 854, supra), it is apparent that numerous tenant complaints concerning petitioner's failure to provide hotel services at the subject premises have been filed with the DHCR. These complaints should be processed on an individual basis by the DHCR pursuant to Amended Code of the Metropolitan Hotel Industry Stabilization Association, Inc. § 33 (g) and adjustments made where appropriate. (Supra, at 854-855.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Carro, Asch and Rosenberger, JJ.


Summaries of

Ruxton Towers Partnership, Ltd. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 21, 1987
129 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Ruxton Towers Partnership, Ltd. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUXTON TOWERS PARTNERSHIP, LTD., Respondent, v. NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)