Opinion
January 22, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County [Francis Pecora, J.].
We find that there was substantial evidence in the record, based on the testimony of three of the Department's witnesses, to support the Commissioner's determination that petitioner, on June 4, 1989, wrongfully engaged in conduct unbecoming of an officer when he masturbated in the presence of a female correction officer and two inmates, and subsequently submitted false and misleading written reports with respect to the incident in question.
In view of the nature of petitioner's misconduct and his employment record, which, in the two years since his appointment as a correction officer indicates that he received a corrective interview for punctuality and attendance problems, we find the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. Further, we find no merit to petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer reached a predetermined conclusion of petitioner's guilt prior to the hearing on the departmental charges.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.