Opinion
Argued May 29, 1911
Decided June 13, 1911
Stephen M. Hoye for appellant.
Matthew J. Wheelehan for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Rourke v. Metz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1911
96 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1911)
Summaries of
Matter of Rourke v. Metz
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1911
96 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for
Matter of Rourke v. Metz
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of LILLIAN V. ROURKE, Appellant, for a…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 13, 1911
Citations
96 N.E. 1129 (N.Y. 1911)
96 N.E. 1129
Citing Cases
People v. Ladew
To be entitled to notice, the land must be occupied within the definition in the statute. People ex rel.…
Maffetone v. MicariUpon these facts, I must first resolve the procedural question of the parties' status in this proceeding, and…