From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Roth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1936
248 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

October 23, 1936.


Decree of the Surrogate's Court of Queens county reversed on the law, with costs to appellant payable out of the estate, and the executrix directed to make payment of the legacy to the appellant, Rose Roth. The gift of $2,100 in paragraph ninth is absolute. The language following that absolute gift, respecting time of payment, is, at best, a condition subsequent, which is inoperative because there is no gift over in the event of a breach of said condition. It is impossible to comply with the condition because the lot upon which the building was desired to be placed is not accessible to the street except over the land of another. Under these circumstances the language expressing a desire that such a building be erected is precatory, not mandatory. ( Matter of Vandevort, 62 Hun, 612; Matter of Donald, 149 Misc. 142; Allen v. Trustees of Great Neck Free Church, 240 App. Div. 206. ) Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Roth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1936
248 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Matter of Roth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of ROSE ROTH, Legatee, for a Construction…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Matter of Warriner

In the light of these circumstances, it seems quite clear that the gift was not limited by the performance of…