From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Rotblut v. Trieschmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Assuming, arguendo, that the appellant's assertions are true, she has failed to indicate any bias or misconduct by the arbitrator, and prejudice arising therefrom, which would warrant vacatur of the arbitration award (see, Matter of Silverman [Benmore Coats], 61 N.Y.2d 299; North Syracuse Cent. School Dist. v. North Syracuse Educ. Assn., 45 N.Y.2d 195; Imgest Fin. Establishment v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, 172 A.D.2d 291; Brewster Excavating Corp. v. Woods Assocs., 162 A.D.2d 490; CPLR 7511 [b]).

We have examined the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Rotblut v. Trieschmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 1994
201 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Rotblut v. Trieschmann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOIS B. ROTBLUT, Appellant, v. CHARLES TRIESCHMANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 738 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 845