From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ross v. Dittmar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 1, 1996

Appeal from the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J., Miklitsch, H.E.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, he failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating a substantial change in circumstances since his last petition for modification which would warrant a further downward modification of his child support obligations ( see, Matter of Sutera v. Sutera, 204 A.D.2d 648; Matter of Leone v. Leone, 137 A.D.2d 753, 755; Family Ct Act § 461 [b] [ii]). Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Ross v. Dittmar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1996
229 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Matter of Ross v. Dittmar

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAULINE ROSS, Respondent, v. WARREN DITTMAR, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 396 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 643

Citing Cases

O'Shea v. Cross

In 2010 the plaintiff moved in the Supreme Court, inter alia, for a downward modification of his child…

In re Keller v. Keller

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In order to establish entitlement to a…